Loading...
Increase Font Size
Reduce Font Size
High Contrast
Grayscale
Light Background
Reset

Building Collaboration and Local Ecosystem

|
Play Audio
|
Download content:

Building Collaboration and Local Ecosystem

Module overview

Introduction
Learning outcomes, why collaboration matters, key concepts

Section 1: Local Ecosystem
Ecosystem logic, why isolated actions fail, integration pathways

Section 2: Operational Collaboration
Mapping, trust-building, coordination mechanisms

Section 3: Quadruple Helix
Roles of public, private, civil society & academic sectors

Final reflection
Key takeaways & next steps

Learning objectives
  • Understand ecosystem-based approaches to migrant and refugee inclusion
  • Identify and engage relevant stakeholders across all sectors
  • Create operational synergies and integrated support pathways
  • Coordinate multi-actor support across the Quadruple Helix
  • Replicate and adapt SIMPLE-inspired initiatives in your local context
Who is this module for?

This module is designed for stakeholders from all four sectors of the Quadruple Helix:

Public sector Civil Society Private sector Academia
  • Municipalities & local authorities
  • Public employment services
  • Social welfare departments
  • Integration agencies
  • NGOs & refugee support orgs
  • Community organisations
  • Migrant-led associations
  • SMEs & larger companies
  • Employers & HR professionals
  • Business associations
  • Social entrepreneurs
  • Universities & research centres
  • VET providers
  • Think Tanks

 

Why collaboration matters in migrant integration?

The challenge

  • Integration pathways are complex and multi-dimensional
  • No single organisation has all the resources needed
  • Siloed services create gaps and duplication
  • Migrants navigate fragmented systems alone
  • Trust deficits between sectors slow progress

The ecosystem solution

  • Coordinated multi-actor pathways
  • Shared responsibilities and resources
  • Trust-based partnerships across sectors
  • Integrated support from day 1
  • Sustainable, community-embedded services

Understanding Local Ecosystem

What is a local ecosystem?
A local ecosystem is not simply a network of organisations. It is a living system of resources, relationships and coordinated actors from civil society, public, private, and academic sectors constituting together a Quadruple Helix that creates conditions for inclusion.

 

Networking vs Ecosystem collaboration
  Networking Ecosystem collaboration
Purpose

Exchange information

Co-create solutions & share responsibility

Relationships

Loose, voluntary connections

Trust-based, operational partnerships

Coordination

Informal, ad hoc

Structured, regular, and purposeful

Resources

Each organisation acts alone

Shared resources and complementary roles

Outcomes

Individual results

Collective inclusion outcomes

Duration

Event-based

Long-term, sustainable engagement

 

Why isolated interventions fail?

Key insights from the SIMPLE Model pilot in Poland shows that entrepreneurship support alone is not enough

 

 Ukrainian refugee women needed ALL of these supports simultaneously — not one at a time.

Key learning from the SIMPLE Model pilot

Trust comes first
Ukrainian women engaged in the SIMPLE pilots needed to trust the ecosystem before engaging with any service. NGO relationships were the gateway to everything else.

Coordination prevents drop-out
Regular coordination between actors meant women were not 'lost' between services. Warm handoffs — not cold referrals.

Women-led, women-centred design
The model respected the specific contexts of refugee women: childcare, language, trauma, cultural norms, and family dynamics.

Community is not a 'nice to have'
Peer networks and community events were as important as business coaching. Isolation was a major barrier to entrepreneurship.

Expert diversity matters
Access to legal, financial, sectoral, and linguistic experts — all in one ecosystem — dramatically improves business viability.

Ecosystem sustains beyond the project
Relationships built during the pilot will continue even after funding ended. Ecosystem investment has long-term returns.

Building Operational Collaboration

Ecosystem governance

Collaboration in migrant inclusion is not only about participation — it is about governance capacity.

Effective inclusion pathways emerge when organisations move beyond isolated service delivery and develop:

  • Operational interdependence
  • Shared coordination mechanisms
  • Adaptive decision-making
  • Long-term ecosystem ownership

Why collaboration remains weak?

  • Coordination is informal & person-dependent
  • Organisations operate within sectoral silos
  • Cooperation is project-based, not structural
  • Stakeholders lack tools to align objectives

 

WEAK ECOSYSTEM LOGIC
“How can we involve more stakeholders?”
STRONG ECOSYSTEM LOGIC
“How can we create operational conditions where actors depend on each other to achieve outcomes none can achieve alone?”

 

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTITIONERS

Building collaboration capacity requires:

  • Understanding institutional incentives
  • Aligning operational & strategic objectives
  • Managing inter-organisational asymmetries
  • Designing low-friction coordination systems
  • Building trust through repeated operational interaction
  • Embedding collaboration into routine institutional practice
Building trust & sustainable engagement
  1. Start with shared values
    Identify overlapping motivations. What does each actor care about? Build on common ground before addressing differences.
  2. Create small wins early
    Begin with low-risk joint activities — shared events, co-training, joint referrals — before asking for deeper commitments.
  3. Make collaboration easy
    Simplify processes. Reduce admin burden. Use clear agreements, shared tools, and regular light-touch communication.
  4. Celebrate and communicate
    Share results with partners. Show their contribution. Public recognition and evidence of impact deepens commitment.
Coordination mechanisms for ecosystem management

Multi-Stakeholder Coordination Table

Regular coordination space: NGOs, municipalities, employment services, VET providers, employers, and community actors.

In a local ecosystem replicating the SIMPLE Model:

  • NGOs present barriers faced by Ukrainian women
  • VET providers coordinate training calendars
  • Employers communicate recruitment needs
  • Employment offices share labour market opportunities
  • Municipalities align support services

✔ Avoids fragmented interventions

✔ Improves strategic alignment

✔ Accelerates cross-sector problem-solving

 

Shared Case Management

Coordinated tracking of participant pathways across organisations while respecting confidentiality rules.

Actors in a refugee women entrepreneurship pathway share updates:

  • NGO mentor municipality social worker
  • Avoid duplication of support
  • Entrepreneurship trainer business mentor
  • Monitor progress & identify barriers quickly

✔ Enables personalised support

✔ Improves operational coordination

✔ Prevents fragmentation of services

 

Ecosystem Coordinator Role

Dedicated actor responsible for maintaining ecosystem functionality and collaboration continuity.

For instance, an NGO or municipality coordinator who:

  • Organises stakeholder meetings & monitors referrals
  • Supports conflict resolution
  • Follows up with employers & identifies gaps
  • Ensures continuity despite staff turnover

✔ Prevents collaboration collapse

✔ Maintains operational momentum

✔ Strengthens long-term sustainability

 

Warm Referral System

Structured transfer of beneficiaries between organisations with active follow-up and continuity.

A Ukrainian woman referred through an NGO community event is:

  • Referred to a municipality-supported mentoring programme
  • Introduced to a local employer or business mentor
  • Connected to a VET entrepreneurship course
  • Followed up by the NGO accompaniment team

✔ Reduces participant drop-out

✔ Improves trust and continuity

✔ Strengthens ecosystem integration capacity

 

Communication Protocol

Agreed rules for ecosystem communication and operational interaction between all partners.

Partners implementing a local inclusion initiative agree on:

  • Response times for referrals & meeting frequency
  • Confidentiality standards
  • Escalation procedures & communication channels
  • Decision-making processes

✔ Reduces misunderstandings

✔ Clarifies expectations

✔ Improves institutional reliability and trust

 

Shared Monitoring & Evaluation

Common ecosystem-level indicators beyond individual organisational outputs.

Instead of each actor measuring only its own outputs, the ecosystem jointly tracks:

  • Employability & entrepreneurial activation outcomes
  • Social integration progress
  • Participation continuity of Ukrainian refugee women
  • Long-term engagement across all partner pathways

✔ Aligns ecosystem objectives

✔ Strengthens evidence-based collaboration

✔ Improves scalability & policy relevance

 

Defining why collaboration is necessary

High-performing ecosystems are built around interdependency, not networking.

 

ADVANCED COLLABORATION PRINCIPLE

Collaboration should only exist where interdependency creates added value.

 

A COMMON WEAKNESS

Organisations sought partnerships before defining:

  • Which problem required collaboration
  • Which actor possessed the missing capacity
  • What operational value each stakeholder would contribute

 

SIMPLE PILOT INSIGHT

The SIMPLE model pilot required simultaneous mobilisation of:

NGOs — outreach and trust-building

Businesses — employability pathways

Public institutions — ecosystem legitimacy

Educational actors — knowledge and skills support

No single actor could independently deliver the intended integration outcomes.

 

OPERATIONAL DIAGNOSTIC FRAMEWORK

Before engaging stakeholders, identify:

DIMENSION KEY QUESTION

Structural Gap

What cannot be solved internally?

Missing Capability

Which actor controls the missing resource, legitimacy, or expertise?

Operational Dependency

At which stage does our initiative rely on another actor?

Systemic Value

How does collaboration improve outcomes for beneficiaries?

 

Understanding institutional motivations

Effective collaboration begins with institutional analysis, not invitation.

 

ADVANCED ENGAGEMENT PRINCIPLE

Stakeholders engage when collaboration helps them solve THEIR institutional problem.

Each sector operates under different:

  • Incentives
  • Accountability structures
  • Political constraints
  • Timeframes
  • Success indicators

DO NOT frame collaboration through:

❌  Abstract social value alone

Frame it through:

  • ✔  Operational relevance
  • ✔  Institutional incentives
  • ✔  Shared risk reduction
  • ✔  Strategic utility

 

INSTITUTIONAL LOGIC MAPPING

Each sector follows a different operational logic — know it before engaging.

ACTOR PRIMARY OPERATIONAL LOGIC
Public Sector

Legitimacy, policy implementation, measurable outcomes

NGOs

Trust, accessibility, community impact

Businesses

Efficiency, workforce needs, risk management

Academia / VET

Knowledge transfer, certification, institutional relevance

 

SIMPLE LESSON

Private actors engaged more when inclusion was linked to workforce development, burden was reduced, and NGO / public actors acted as coordination intermediaries.

Designing high-value collaboration proposals

Weak partnerships fail because value exchange is unclear.

KEY PRINCIPLE

Collaboration succeeds when the perceived value exceeds the perceived coordination cost.

Why collaborations remain symbolic:

Communicated Not defined
  • Vision
  • Principles
  • Social goals
  • Contributions
  • Incentives
  • Responsibilities
  • Returns

 

SIMPLE ECOSYSTEM INSIGHT

Stakeholders engaged more sustainably when:

  • ✔  Roles were operationally defined
  • ✔  Contributions were realistic
  • ✔  Expectations were phased progressively
  • ✔  Collaboration generated visible short-term outcomes

 

ADVANCED VALUE PROPOSITION FRAMEWORK

A strong collaboration proposal clarifies all the following five dimensions:

DIMENSION EXAMPLE

Strategic Value

Access to trained participants ready for employment or entrepreneurship

Operational Value

NGO manages outreach, screening, accompaniment — reducing partner burden

Risk Mitigation

Pilot-based engagement before scaling — test before committing fully

Resource Implications

Limited monthly time commitment; roles are bounded and realistic

Institutional Gain

Visibility, policy relevance, recruitment support, and CSR value

Perceived Value  >  Perceived Coordination Cost  =  Sustained Engagement

The Quadruple Helix Approach

PUBLIC SECTOR | Core contributions to the Ecosystem

Policy Enablement & Mandate
Embed integration goals in local development plans, municipal budgets, and formal mandates. Create the legal and regulatory conditions for ecosystem collaboration to thrive.

Institutional Funding & Resource
Allocate stable, multi-year funding for ecosystem infrastructure — not just project-based grants. Support coordination roles, shared platforms, and community ambassador programmes.

Data & Evidence
Collect, share, and publish integration data at the local level. Use evidence to identify gaps, adapt services, and demonstrate impact to political stakeholders.

Coordination & Convening
Host and chair multi-stakeholder integration tables. Act as the neutral broker bringing NGOs, employers, and academia to the same table around shared inclusion objectives.

Formal Activation Pathways
Anchor legal status, social benefits, employment rights, housing, and healthcare. Ensure migrants can access what they are entitled to through streamlined, navigable processes.

Legitimacy & Political Visibility
Give institutional recognition and visibility to ecosystem collaboration. Champions at political level signal that inclusion is a priority — which unlocks commitment from other sectors.

PUBLIC SECTOR | Engagement strategy -> Barrier -> Solution

ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY

BARRIERS SOLUTION

Create joint referral pathways between NGOs, municipalities, employment services, and training providers to support Ukrainian women from outreach to employability

Fragmented services and unclear institutional responsibilities of public actors

Establish simple referral protocols and regular coordination meetings

Co-design mentorship, entrepreneurship, and employability activities with public authorities and local actors

Public institutions may perceive initiatives as external or temporary

Align activities with local employment and integration priorities

Use trusted community actors to connect migrant women with institutional services and opportunities

Public authorities often struggle to reach vulnerable beneficiaries directly

Engage NGOs, migrant associations, and community mediators as outreach partners

Build local working groups linking municipalities, employers, NGOs, and VET providers around women’s employability

Different sectors operate with different timelines and objectives

Define small operational goals and concrete responsibilities for each actor

Share pilot evidence, beneficiary feedback, and local labour market needs with public authorities

Institutions may require measurable impact before committing resources

Use simple monitoring data, testimonials, and practical case examples

 

PUBLIC SECTOR | Practical exercise 1

If You Are an NGO: Building Public Partnerships for Refugee Women Employability

Objective: Design a practical strategy to engage municipalities and employment services in a local initiative supporting Ukrainian refugee women through mentorship, entrepreneurship support, and community-based employability pathways.

 

Step-by-step instructions

  1. Ecosystem Mapping (10 min) - Identify:
    • Which public institutions are most relevant for refugee women employability in your area?
    • Which actors are already collaborating with your NGO?
    • Which institutional actors are still missing
  2. Identify gaps: Using the Strategy → Barrier → Solution chains, select the 2 barriers most relevant to your context. Then identify: the main institutional barrier one realistic operational solution.
  3. Design a Micro -Action
    • Define one concrete action your NGO could implement within the next 3 months to strengthen cooperation with public authorities.
  4. Commitment Action - Write:
    • one institution you will contact
    • one collaboration proposal you could present
 
Reflection Questions
  1. Which public authority has the strongest influence on employability pathways locally?
  2. What prevents stronger cooperation between NGOs and employment/public services?
  3. How could mentorship/community support complement public employability services?
  4. What type of evidence would convince municipalities to support your initiative?
  5. How can NGOs help public institutions better reach vulnerable migrant women?
  6. What is one ecosystem gap your organisation could help solve immediately?
PUBLIC SECTOR | Practical exercise 2

If You Are a Company: Engaging Public Authorities to Create Employability Opportunities

Objective: Design a collaboration strategy between businesses and public authorities to support refugee women through employability, mentoring, entrepreneurship, or vocational pathways inspired by the SIMPLE model.

 

Step-by-step instructions

  1. Identify Your Potential Contribution – Discuss what your company can realistically offer: mentoring? internships? entrepreneurship coaching?  networking? skills development?
  2. Strategy → Barrier → Solution Analysis - Choose ONE strategy to engage municipalities, employment offices or public training services. Then identify: one operational barrier one practical solution
  3. Build an Ecosystem Pathway - Design a simple collaboration flow:
    Public authority → Company → NGO/community actor → Beneficiary 
    Who does what?
  4. Operational Commitment - Write:
    • one public actor you would approach
    • one pilot activity you could test
 
Reflection Questions
  1. Why should public authorities collaborate with local companies on migrant inclusion?
  2. What barriers discourage companies from engaging vulnerable groups?
  3. How could businesses support refugee women interested in entrepreneurship?
  4. What role could municipalities play in facilitating private sector engagement?
  5. How can companies cooperate with NGOs/community actors more effectively?
  6. What low-cost pilot collaboration could realistically start in your area?
PUBLIC SECTOR | Practical exercise 3

If You Are a University or VET Provider: Supporting Inclusion Through Training and Certification

Objective: Design a practical collaboration between academia, public authorities, and local stakeholders to support refugee women through certified training, skills recognition, mentoring preparation, or employability support.

 

Step-by-step instructions

  1. Identify a Training or Certification Need - Discuss: 
    • Which skills or competencies are currently missing in your local integration ecosystem?
    • What could universities/VET providers certify or support?
  2. Strategy → Barrier → Solution Analysis - Choose ONE engagement strategy involving public authorities (certified mentor training; entrepreneurship micro-credentials, recognition of prior learning, employability workshops, ecosystem research support). Identify: one institutional barrier one operational solution.
  3. Design a Practical Academic Contribution - Define:
    • one concrete training or certification pathway
    • one public authority that should support it.
  4. Commitment Action - Identify:
    • one local stakeholder your institution could collaborate with
    • one activity that could start within 6 months
 
Reflection Questions
  1. How can universities/VET providers contribute to employability pathways for refugee women?
  2. Which local actors should co-design training programmes?
  3. What prevents academic knowledge from reaching practitioners effectively?
  4. How could certification strengthen migrant women employability?
  5. How can public authorities support more flexible learning pathways?
  6. What practical contribution could your institution provide immediately?
ACADEMIA & VET| Core contributions to the Ecosystem

Evidence generation
Produce rigorous research on migrant needs, integration barriers, and ecosystem effectiveness. Translate evidence into accessible formats that inform policy and practice.

Curriculum development
Embed integration, diversity, and social innovation into mainstream education curricula. Prepare students across disciplines to contribute to inclusive local economies.

Knowledge Transfer & Replication
Document, synthesise, and disseminate good practices. Connect local actors to wider knowledge networks and comparative international experience.

Training & Capacity Building
Design and deliver training programmes for practitioners, policymakers, and community workers. Build the ecosystem's human capital — not just beneficiaries' skills.

Evaluation & Impact Measurement
Provide independent, rigorous evaluation of ecosystem initiatives. Help actors understand what works, at what cost, and why — and use evidence to iterate and improve.

Student Placements & Applied Research
Deploy students and researchers directly in ecosystem organisations. This creates mutual benefit: organisations gain capacity, students gain real-world learning.

ACADEMIA & VET| Engagement strategy -> Barrier -> Solution

ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY

BARRIERS SOLUTION

Collaborate with universities/VET providers to develop certified training pathways for Ukrainian refugee women participating in mentorship / entrepreneurship programmes

Academic institutions often have rigid and slow certification procedures

Start with short modular certificates, micro-credentials, or non-formal recognition systems

Engage academia in recognising prior learning and professional skills of refugee women

Universities may lack flexible procedures for recognising informal or foreign qualifications

Pilot competency-based assessments and simplified local recognition mechanisms

Involve universities in monitoring and evaluating integration and employability initiatives

Academic outputs may be too theoretical or disconnected from operational realities

Co-design research activities with NGOs, companies, municipalities, and beneficiaries

Collaborate with VET providers to organise practical employability workshops linked to local labour market needs

Training programmes are often not adapted to migrant women’s realities and care responsibilities

Develop flexible and hybrid learning formats with community-based support

Invite universities to participate in local ecosystem coordination groups

Academia is often excluded from operational decision-making spaces

Create thematic working groups where universities contribute with research, training, and evaluation expertise

 

ACADEMIA & VET| Practical exercise 1

If You Are a Municipality: Turning Universities into Long-Term Integration Partners

Objective: Design a strategy to engage universities or VET providers in a local initiative supporting Ukrainian refugee women through employability, entrepreneurship, mentoring, and skills recognition pathways.

 

Step-by-step instructions

  1. Identify One Local Need - Examples: mentor training,  certification, language support, entrepreneurship skills, recognition of prior learning
  2. Select One Academic Partner – Choose university, VET provider, research centre, adult learning institution
  3. Identify one engagement barrier one practical solution
  4. Design One Collaborative Action - What could realistically start within 6 months?
 
Reflection Questions
  1. Why should universities participate in local integration ecosystems?
  2. What can public authorities offer academia beyond funding?
  3. How could certification strengthen employability pathways for refugee women?
  4. What prevents universities from engaging in operational local initiatives?
  5. How could municipalities make academic collaboration more attractive?
  6. What small pilot collaboration could become a long-term partnership?
ACADEMIA & VET| Practical exercise 2

If You Are an NGO: Co-Creating Learning Pathways with Academia

Objective: Design a collaboration strategy with universities or VET providers to strengthen refugee women inclusion through mentoring, entrepreneurship support, training recognition, and community-based learning.

 

Step-by-step instructions

  1. Identify One Capacity Gap - Examples: certification, digital skills, language learning, mentor preparation, employability training
  2. Choose One Academic Collaboration Strategy - Examples: micro-credentials, joint workshops, student placements, community-based learning, participatory research
  3. Identify - one institutional barrier one operational solution
  4. Design One Practical Initiative - What activity could your NGO and an academic institution co-deliver?
 
Reflection Questions
  1. What knowledge or expertise could universities bring to your initiative?
  2. How could academic recognition increase women’s confidence and employability?
  3. What prevents NGOs and universities from collaborating more often?
  4. How could students contribute to refugee women inclusion activities?
  5. What type of training would be most useful for beneficiaries in your local context?
  6. How can NGOs help academia stay connected to real community needs?
ACADEMIA & VET| Practical exercise 3

If You Are a Company: Building Skills and Talent Pathways with Academia

Objective: Design a collaboration between companies, universities/VET providers, and local actors to support Ukrainian refugee women through practical skills development, employability pathways, mentoring, and entrepreneurship opportunities.

 

Step-by-step instructions

  1. Identify One Labour Market Need - Examples: digital skills, customer services, entrepreneurship, vocational skills, business mentoring
  2. Select One Academic Engagement Strategy - Examples: internships, short certified training, entrepreneurship labs, mentoring programmes, practical workshops
  3. Identify - one collaboration barrier  one practical solution
  4. Design One Pilot Action - What ecosystem-based initiative could your company test with academia?
 
Reflection Questions
  1. Why should companies collaborate with universities on migrant inclusion?
  2. What practical skills are currently missing in your local ecosystem?
  3. How could academia better respond to labour market realities?
  4. What role could mentoring play in employability pathways?
  5. How can companies support learning opportunities beyond recruitment?
  6. What small collaboration could create long-term employability impact?
PRIVATE SECTOR| Core contributions to the Ecosystem

Employment & Activation Pathways
Create structured job, internship, and work placement pathways. The SIMPLE Model pilot in Poland explicitly involved companies and business organisations as core ecosystem actors in the labour market activation chain for Ukrainian refugee women.

Vocational Training Partnership
Partner with VET providers and training organisations to create sector-specific upskilling pathways. In the SIMPLE project, vocational activation organisations were core ecosystem actors alongside employment services and businesses.

Market & Network Access
Connect migrant entrepreneurs to supply chains, clients, and business networks. SIMPLE Polish pilot participants developed real business ideas and needed market orientation — which required direct engagement of business associations and commercial networks.

Entrepreneurship & Self-Employment Support
Support migrant-led business development through mentoring, market access, and financial literacy. The SIMPLE model tested in Poland made entrepreneurship support its centrepiece, with business actors directly involved in pitch preparation and business plan mentoring.

Business Mentoring
Offer one-to-one mentoring from experienced professionals. Both the SIMPLE model pilots used expert mentors — in Poland from the business and entrepreneurship sector; in Italy from community-level professional networks — as a critical support layer.

Diversity & Inclusion Leadership
Demonstrate that diversity works through public data, case studies, and visible leadership. Employer champions in both pilots helped legitimise the model with more risk-averse private sector actors who needed social proof before engaging.

PRIVATE SECTOR| Engagement strategy -> Barrier -> Solution

ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY

BARRIERS SOLUTION

Involve companies in mentorship and employability pathways for Ukrainian refugee wome

Businesses may perceive inclusion initiatives as time-consuming or outside their core priorities

Start with small and flexible mentoring or networking activities requiring limited commitment

Collaborate with local employers to co-design entrepreneurship and vocational support activities

Companies may not understand the specific barriers faced by refugee women

Organise short ecosystem meetings where NGOs and beneficiaries present real local needs and experiences

Engage the private sector through CSR and local social impact initiatives

Companies may not immediately see operational or economic value

Link participation to workforce development, local visibility, and community impact

Create partnerships between businesses, NGOs, and employment services to support internships or work-based learning

Administrative procedures and unclear responsibilities discourage employer participation

Develop simple cooperation frameworks with clearly defined roles and contact persons

Involve entrepreneurs and business associations in local integration ecosystem working groups

Private actors are often disconnected from local inclusion coordination mechanisms

Create practical, action-oriented meetings focused on concrete labour market and entrepreneurship opportunities

 

PRIVATE SECTOR| Practical exercise 1

If You Are a Public Authority: Convincing Employers to Join Your Inclusion Ecosystem

Objective: Prepare a realistic “business case for inclusion” to convince a local employer to participate in a SIMPLE-inspired initiative supporting Ukrainian refugee women through mentoring, employability, or entrepreneurship pathways.

 

Step-by-step instructions

  1. Choose the Employer (5 min) - Select: SME, local company, business association, social enterprise, HR network
  2. Build the Pitch - Explain: What problem does the initiative solve for the employer? What is the minimum commitment required? What support will public authorities provide?
  3. Address Resistance - Prepare responses to: lack of time, admin burden, uncertainty, language/cultural concerns
  4. 60-Second Employer Pitch - Present your proposal. Another group plays the “skeptical employer.”
 
Reflection Questions
  1. Why should employers care about refugee women employability?
  2. What practical incentives matter most for companies?
  3. How can municipalities reduce perceived risks for businesses?
  4. What type of collaboration is easiest for employers to test first?
  5. Which SIMPLE pilot elements could be attractive to companies?
  6. What would make the partnership sustainable beyond one project?
PRIVATE SECTOR| Practical exercise 2

If you are a University: Making Employers Believe in Your Training Pathway

Objective: Design a practical learning and certification pathway that companies would see as valuable for employing or mentoring Ukrainian refugee women.

 

Step-by-step instructions

  1. Identify One Workforce Gap - Examples: digital skills, customer relations, entrepreneurship, vocational readiness, language support
  2. Design the “Skills Lab” - Create: one short training pathway, one certification element, one employer involvement mechanism
  3. Make It Business-Relevant - Explain: why employers should trust the pathway, how the programme reduces hiring uncertainty
  4. Present Your Partnership Model - Pitch your idea to: employers, municipalities, NGOs
 
Reflection Questions
  1. What makes training “credible” for employers?
  2. How can academia reduce the gap between learning and labour market realities?
  3. Why are micro-credentials attractive for inclusion pathways?
  4. What role can employers play beyond recruitment?
  5. How can training pathways remain flexible for refugee women?
  6. What ecosystem partners are essential for scaling the initiative?
PRIVATE SECTOR| Practical exercise 3

If You Are an NGO: Designing a Company-Friendly Inclusion Initiative

Objective: Transform a community-based inclusion idea into a partnership proposal that local businesses would realistically support.

 

Step-by-step instructions

  1. Choose a Beneficiary Need - Examples: mentoring, work experience,  entrepreneurship coaching, confidence-building, networking.
  2. Reframe It for Employers - Discuss:
    1. Why should a company participate?
    2. What value does the partnership create?
  3. Build a Low-Risk Collaboration - Design:
    1. a simple pilot activity
    2. limited employer commitment
    3. shared responsibilities
  4. Test the Proposal - Another group acts as: HR managers, small business owners,  skeptical employers.
 
Reflection Questions
  1. Why do many companies remain outside local inclusion ecosystems?
  2. How can NGOs speak the “language” of employers more effectively?
  3. What type of support reduces employer hesitation?
  4. Which private actors are easiest to engage first?
  5. How can refugee women themselves become ambassadors of the initiative?
  6. What small success could unlock larger partnerships later?
CIVIL SOCIETY| Core contributions to the Ecosystem

First Point of Trust
NGOs are the gateway to all other services. In the Italian pilot, NGOs and local social actors were the primary entry point for vulnerable migrants — building the trust that enabled later participation in structured support programmes.

Personalised Accompaniment
Walk alongside individuals through multi-step processes. The Italian model emphasised mentoring and accompaniment as core to its community integration approach — not a peripheral add-on, but the backbone of the pathway.

Outreach to the Most Vulnerable
Reach populations that public services cannot. NGOs in both pilots used informal outreach — community spaces, faith settings, word of mouth — to find isolated, traumatised, or undocumented individuals who would never self-refer to a public agency.

Cultural & Linguistic Mediation
Bridge language and cultural barriers. Both SIMPLE pilots used community mediators and cultural liaisons to ensure migrant women could navigate institutional systems — especially important in the Polish activation pathway where legal and employment language was highly technical.

Community Building & Peer Networks
Create peer connection and mutual support. Both pilots demonstrated that community cohesion events and peer networks significantly reduced dropout. In Poland, community events complemented the activation focus; in Italy they were central to the model.

Advocacy & Voice Amplification
Translate lived experience into evidence. Civil society organisations in both pilots contributed to co-design processes and helped public and academic partners understand what actually works on the ground.

CIVIL SOCIETY| Engagement strategy -> Barrier -> Solution

ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY

BARRIERS SOLUTION

Use NGOs as trusted outreach and referral actors for Ukrainian refugee women who are isolated or outside institutional systems

Public institutions often struggle to reach the most vulnerable women directly; mistrust toward institutions can reduce participation

Build NGO-led first-contact pathways using peer outreach, cultural mediators, informal community spaces, and word-of-mouth networks

Create joint mentoring and accompaniment pathways between NGOs, municipalities, and employment actors

NGO accompaniment work is often underfunded, fragmented, and dependent on short-term projects

Formalise referral pathways and include mentoring/accompaniment costs within public-funded employability programmes

Involve NGOs in co-designing training and employability actions based on real community needsx

Civil society organisations are frequently consulted too late or only operationally, without influence on programme design

Establish participatory planning groups where NGOs contribute to programme adaptation, outreach methods, and participant support design

Use community-building activities as an engagement entry point before employability activation

Many refugee women face trauma, isolation, language barriers, or lack confidence to join formal labour market programmes immediately

Combine employability support with safe spaces, peer groups, networking events, and informal community activities, as tested in the Italian pilot

Position NGOs as ecosystem connectors rather than isolated service providers

Position NGOs as ecosystem connectors rather than isolated service providers

Create shared coordination tables, joint referral systems, and collaborative local action plans focused on migrant women inclusion

 

CIVIL SOCIETY| Practical exercise 1

If You Are a Public Authority: Building a Municipal-NGO Partnership for Inclusion

Objective: Design a practical collaboration framework through which a municipality or employment service can work effectively with NGOs supporting Ukrainian refugee women.

 

Step-by-step instructions

  1. Map the NGO ecosystem (8 min) -  Identify: NGOs already active with migrants/refugees, grassroots organisations, informal community groups
  2. Identify the coordination gap - What currently prevents stronger collaboration between your institution and NGOs?(e.g. referrals, communication, funding, bureaucracy, trust)
  3. Design one structural solution - Choose ONE: referral protocol, coordination table, joint outreach campaign, co-funded mentoring pathway, shared case management process
  4. Test feasibility - What political, administrative, or budget barriers could emerge? How would you reduce them?
 
Reflection Questions
  1. Are NGOs treated as equal partners or only implementers in your system?
  2. Which local NGO already has strong trust within Ukrainian migrant communities?
  3. What would improve coordination immediately without new funding?
  4. How can municipalities support long-term NGOs’ sustainability?
  5. What risks emerge if public services try to work without NGOs?
  6. Which SIMPLE pilot practice could realistically be institutionalised locally?
CIVIL SOCIETY| Practical exercise 2

If You Are a Company: Becoming a Business Partner in Inclusion

Objective: Help companies design a realistic partnership model with NGOs supporting Ukrainian refugee women through employment, mentoring, or entrepreneurship initiatives.

 

Step-by-step instructions

  1. Select your company profile - Choose: SME, large employer, HR agency, local business association, entrepreneur network
  2. Identify your potential contribution - What could your company realistically offer? Internships, mentoring, flexible jobs, business coaching, entrepreneurship support, sponsorship/resources
  3. Design the NGO partnership - What would the NGO handle that your company cannot? How would responsibilities be divided?
  4. Reduce the business risk - Identify 2 concerns your management team may raise and propose solutions.
 
Reflection Questions
  1. What motivates businesses to engage beyond CSR visibility?
  2. Which NGO capability is most valuable for employers?
  3. What is the minimum viable partnership your company could test tomorrow?
  4. How can refugee women become long-term contributors, not temporary beneficiaries?
  5. What would convince a skeptical manager to participate?
  6. How could your company benefit from stronger local integration ecosystems?
CIVIL SOCIETY| Practical exercise 3

If you are a University: Designing a Practice-Oriented Learning Partnership with local NGOs

Objective: help your university design a concrete collaboration with NGOs supporting Ukrainian refugee women — transforming academic knowledge into accessible learning, certification, and integration opportunities.

 

Step-by-step instructions

  1. Choose a real NGO partner (5 min) - Identify one NGO in your local ecosystem working with migrant or refugee women
  2. Identify one practical challenge (8 min) - What support gap could your institution help address? (e.g., language certification, recognition of prior learning, entrepreneurship preparation, digital skills, intercultural mediation, employability preparation
  3. Design the academic contribution - Choose ONE concrete action your institution could realistically implement within 6 months: short certified course, micro-credential, internship pathway, recognition procedure, applied research project, community learning workshop
  4. Build the partnership model - Define: what the NGO contributes, what the university contributes, how Ukrainian women would access the programme
 
Reflection Questions
  1. Why might NGOs struggle to deliver these activities alone?
  2. How can universities make training more flexible and accessible for refugee women?
  3. What certification or recognition would create real labour market value?
  4. Could students, researchers, or trainees support NGO activities directly?
  5. What barriers inside your institution could slow down this partnership?
  6. What would make this collaboration sustainable beyond one project?

Final Reflections & Next Steps

Key takeaways
  1. Migrant inclusion is too complex for any one organisation. Ecosystem approaches are not optional — they are necessary.
  2. All four Quadruple Helix sectors have a specific, valued, and irreplaceable role in the ecosystem.
  3. The SIMPLE Model pilot has proved that combining entrepreneurship with community and institutional ecosystem support dramatically improves outcomes.
  4. Trust, coordination mechanisms, and warm referrals are the operational backbone of any effective ecosystem.
  5. Replication requires adaptation: keep the core principles, but tailor the model to your local reality.
What to keep what to adapt from the SIMPLE Model

CORE PRINCIPLES (Keep These)

  • Multi-actor ecosystem approach — always involve all sectors
  • Trust-first design — relationships before services
  • Participant-centred support pathways
  • Holistic support: not just skills, but community and wellbeing
  • Dedicated coordination role
  • Warm referral systems between partners
  • Monitoring of ecosystem-level outcomes

 

ADAPTABLE ELEMENTS (Tailor Locally)

  • Target group (Ukrainian women → other refugee/migrant groups)
  • Sectoral focus (entrepreneurship → employment or other)
  • Language and cultural mediation approach
  • Number and type of ecosystem actors
  • Funding model and resource mix
  • Programme duration and intensity
  • Specific tools and training content
Next steps & available resources

Module 2 Tool
Collaboration Readiness Reflection Tool

Module 3 Preview
Next: how to engage effectively the private sector to support labour market integration

Peer Learning Network
Join the SIMPLE stakeholder network to share experiences and co-create solutions with peers from the SIMPLE partner countries

 

Ecosystem Building Checklist

Stakeholder map completed

Coordination table established

Referral system in place

Trust-building activities planned

Monitoring indicators agreed

Sustainability plan drafted

Ecosystem coordinator identified

Community ambassadors recruited

Partners

Collaboration is at the heart of the SIMPLE project. We work with a diverse range of stakeholders from academia, industry, government, and civil society to achieve our goals. Our partnerships are crucial for establishing strong networks, sharing resources, and maximizing the impact of our initiatives for Ukrainian refugees.

Feedback