The Selected Innovations Compendium constitutes Deliverable 2.4 of the SIMPLE project and represents the culmination of an analytical process implemented under Work Package 2: Assessment of the existing evidence and building the foundation of a new approach/model.
In line with the project proposal and the methodological framework outlined in Deliverable 2.1, the Compendium aims to provide a rigorously filtered and thematically coherent set of innovative practices that can serve as the empirical base for the development of the SIMPLE model and the Theory of Change. The purpose of this document is to present a curated collection of the most promising social innovation best practices focused on education and migrant employability, accompanied by a transparent justification of their selection and an explanation of why they constitute innovative solutions for enhancing the education and employability of migrants.
The process of identification and selection followed a multi-stage, partner-driven and analytically robust methodology, designed to ensure transparency, comparability, and practical relevance. As foreseen in the Methodology (Deliverable 2.1), the mapping phase was carried out through a division of labour among partners, each of whom was assigned specific EU programmes and instruments to screen - such as EaSI, Urban Innovative Actions, Interreg, Erasmus , and Horizon - applying a common set of nine filters: social innovation, migrants/refugees, integration, skill development/education, employability/entrepreneurship, inclusion, multistakeholder collaboration, long-term integration, and women/gender. This ensured that the preliminary pool contained initiatives consistent with the project’s objectives and policy focus. Following this structured approach, partners collectively identified 82 practices that demonstrated potential as promising social innovation solutions for migrant education and employability. These were systematically compiled into a shared repository on the project’s platform, forming a comprehensive database of initiatives across Europe.
At this initial stage, all identified practices were analysed in a general and descriptive manner. Partners filled in a standardised template developed under the WP2 Methodology, collecting key information on each initiative’s title, geographical scope, funding instrument, budget, implementation period, target groups, and references to available documentation. A particular focus was placed on identifying whether the practice was supported by evaluation reports, impact studies, or other forms of external assessment, a criterion that later became decisive in the filtering process. This allowed the consortium to distinguish between projects with anecdotal claims of success and those demonstrating documented evidence of effectiveness, sustainability, and potential for transferability.
Through a participatory review session, partners cross-validated the analytical findings and assessed the strategic fit of each practice with their own organisational expertise, local ecosystem, and capacity to mobilise stakeholders in future implementation. Each partner provided structured feedback on their potential to pilot or scale up a given practice—considering their existing networks, operational experience, and access to relevant target groups. This qualitative dimension complemented the analytical scoring, ensuring that the final shortlist of 13 practices was not only methodologically sound but also feasible for replication in the local contexts represented by the consortium.
This blended methodology combining documentary analysis, comparative assessment, and participatory validation guarantees both scientific credibility and operational relevance. The process led to a selection that balances diversity of themes (education, VET, entrepreneurship, inclusion, housing, and digital empowerment) with consistency in methodological rigor and evidence-based impact. The resulting Compendium therefore stands as the outcome of a transparent, multi-level and partner-engaged analytical process, providing a reliable and actionable foundation for the development of the SIMPLE innovative model for Ukrainian migrants’ employability.
The thirteen practices presented in this Compendium represent the outcome of the analytical and participatory process described above. Together, they illustrate the diversity and richness of social innovation in Europe, showcasing models that effectively combine education, training, employability support, and social inclusion measures for migrants and refugees. Each practice reflects a distinctive approach - ranging from local community-based interventions to transnational frameworks - yet all share a strong evidence base, demonstrated impact, and clear potential for transferability. They constitute the foundation for the SIMPLE project’s innovative model and provide concrete reference points for future piloting and scaling activities within the consortium and beyond.
|
Field |
Integration in the labour market - Developing quality competence assessment strategies, training curricula, self-empowerment initiatives, and a workplace language learning concept |
|
Country/Region |
SE, BE, DE, NO, AT, TR |
|
Lead organisation |
Region Västra Götalan |
|
Project period |
2018 - 2019 |
|
Funding source(s) |
EaSI VP/2016/015/00 |
|
Total budget |
€ 2,319,163 |
|
Target Group Definition |
FIER specifically targeted disadvantaged groups among refugees and asylum-seekers, including:
The project aimed to provide fast-track pathways to labour market integration for these groups, combining skills recognition, language training, and employer engagement. |
|
Size of Target Group |
In Volkhochschulverband Baden-Württemberg with 90 % of the participants integrated into the labour market – many of them into full-time employment.
Source: EC Final Assessment Study (2021), pp. 193–200 |
|
Stakeholders Involved |
Describe actors involved, ideally classified via the quadruple helix model: |
|
Public sector / authorities: Coordinator: Region Västra Götaland Partners:
|
|
|
Civil society / NGOs: SGN Vänersborg (Sweden – associated partner); VHS Baden-Württemberg (Gemrany); YUVA (Turkey); refugee organisations, volunteer groups. |
|
|
Business / employers: 254 employers engaged through placements, mentorships, and language-at-work models |
|
|
Academia / research organisations: Partner: Pädagogische Hochschule Weingarten (PHW), (Germany) |
|
|
Main Objectives of the Initiative |
To develop and test innovative fast-track labour market integration strategies for disadvantaged refugee groups through:
|
|
Key Activities |
|
|
Level of Innovation |
Focused on process and service innovation: each region tested new integration formats adapted to local needs
Notable innovations include:
Innovation was self-assessed per partner; no centralised tool or methodology was developed
Despite the lack of a unified framework, interregional learning inspired cross-transfer (e.g. Oslo adapting Stuttgart’s model) |
|
Evidence of Evaluation or Impact |
Is there a project or third-party evaluation? Tick box: [ ] Internal [x] External: Final EC study confirms the project exceeded most activity targets. However, the EC mentions that there was lack of robust quantitative impact measurement at project level due to fragmented monitoring across pilots. Evaluator was part of lead partner team, which may limit perceived independence |
|
Follow-up Activities / Sustainability |
Some activities successfully continued post-funding, supported by regional or national sources:
However, no formal or centralised upscaling or transfer plan was implemented by the consortium. Sustainability success depended on local policy support and funding availability. |
|
Transferability Potential |
Is there evidence that this could be adapted to other contexts?
Tick box:
[x] Yes (with conditions) [ ] No
While the project's tools and models were designed with adaptability in mind, actual transfer and replication outside the original partners has been limited.
That said, several partners:
|
|
Field |
Integration in the labour market - Developing a regional model of labour market integration for refugees in reception centres (skills assessment, individualised action plan, mentoring and cultural mediation, language and professional training, and individualised job placement services) |
|
Country/Region |
IT, AL |
|
Lead organisation |
National Agency for the Active Labour Market Policy (ANPAL) |
|
Project period |
2018 - 2021 |
|
Funding source(s) |
EaSI VP/2016/015/00 |
|
Total budget |
€ 2,339,568 |
|
Target Group Definition |
|
|
Size of Target Group |
|
|
Stakeholders Involved |
Describe actors involved, ideally classified via the quadruple helix model: |
|
Public sector: ANPAL (coordinator), Piedmont regional employment agency (APL), Italian Ministries of Labour and Interior, multiple prefectures |
|
|
Civil society/NGOs: Forcoop, Kairos Mestieri Social Enterprise, cultural mediators and social mentors |
|
|
Business/employers: Employers in the Piedmont region engaged via job coaching and placement initiatives |
|
|
Academia/research organisations: FRDB (Fondazione Rodolfo Debenedetti – impact evaluator), ITC-ILO (training and dissemination) |
|
|
Main Objectives of the Initiative |
To develop and test an innovative early integration model for asylum seekers, combining mentoring, training, and public-private cooperation, with the ultimate aim of influencing national integration policy and scaling to other regions. |
|
Key Activities |
|
|
Level of Innovation |
FORWORK’s innovation lies in:
While mentoring itself is not new, its integration into mainstream PES practice for asylum seekers was unprecedented in the Italian context. |
|
Evidence of Evaluation or Impact |
[x] Internal: by FRDB [x] External: EC review and extended peer scrutiny
However, final causal impact results were not available at project closure, limiting policy uptake at that stage |
|
Follow-up Activities / Sustainability |
Activities continued post-project in limited form:
Barriers to scaling:
However, methodologies and evaluation tools remain relevant and available for use in similar contexts |
|
Transferability Potential |
Tick box:
[x] Yes, but limited so far [ ] No
Reasoning:
|
|
Field |
Services offer for vulnerable groups - Implementing and evaluating an integrated intervention for the social engagement of young people |
|
Country/Region |
IT, PT, HU, UK |
|
Lead organisations |
Provincia Autonoma di Trento |
|
Project period |
2022 - 2024 |
|
Funding source(s) |
EaSI VP/2020/015/00 |
|
Total budget |
€ 798 692 |
|
Target Group Definition |
COPE targets NEETs (young people aged 15–29 not in education, employment, or training).
|
|
Size of Target Group |
|
|
Stakeholders Involved |
Describe actors involved, ideally classified via the quadruple helix model: |
|
Public sector: Autonomous Province of Trento (lead, Italy), regional/local employment and social services, European Foundation for Philanthropy and Society Development (Croatia) |
|
|
Civil society/NGOs: COGES Don Milani Group (Italy), Federation of Cooperatives of Trento |
|
|
Business/employers: SHINE 2Europe (Portugal) |
|
|
Academia/research organisations: University of New Lisbon, University of East London |
|
|
Main Objectives of the Initiative |
|
|
Key Activities |
|
|
Level of Innovation |
|
|
Evidence of Evaluation or Impact |
[x] Internal: [x] External: EC Final assessment study
The project is ongoing, with most results pending A comprehensive evaluation strategy is in place, covering:
A process evaluation will examine implementation drivers and barriers across local contexts. No impact results are available yet, but the design reflects best practice in social experimentation methodology |
|
Follow-up Activities / Sustainability |
Too early to assess, as the project is still under implementation
Early indicators suggest strong potential for sustainability through:
Stakeholders are already planning how to embed the model within existing service systems. |
|
Transferability Potential |
Tick box:
[x] Yes, (conditional on successful implementation) [ ] No
|
|
Field |
Improving the social and economic integration of refugees through education and self-employment. |
|
Country/Region |
United Kingdom, Belgium, Netherlands, France |
|
Lead organisation |
University of Greenwich |
|
Project period |
Project start date: 2018-03-01
Project end date: 2021-12-31 |
|
Founding source(s) |
Interreg Funds |
|
Total budget |
EUR 4 840 080.95 |
|
Target Group Definition |
Refugees, migrant families, teachers and school communities across France, Belgium, the Netherlands and the UK, particularly those affected by social exclusion and limited access to education and the labour market. |
|
Size of Target Group |
|
|
Stakeholders Involved |
Describe actors involved, ideally classified via the quadruple helix model: |
|
Public sector: Stad Mechelen, Gemeente Middelburg. |
|
|
Civil society/NGOs: ADICE - Association pour le Développement des Initiatives Citoyennes et Européennes, Huis van het Leren, Medway Plus. |
|
|
Business/employers: Local entrepreneurs engaged in mentoring and refugee business networks. |
|
|
Academia/research organisations: University of Greenwich (Lead Organisation), University College Roosevelt (UCR), VIVES Hogeschool, ARhus (vzw Het Portaal). |
|
|
Main Objectives of the Initiative |
To improve refugees’ social and economic integration by fostering engagement in education and self-employment through a co-creation model connecting refugees, teachers and local communities. |
|
Key Activities |
|
|
Level of Innovation |
The project introduced a co-creation model directly involving refugees, parents and teachers in designing education and entrepreneurship actions. It established cross-border learning communities and promoted refugee-led initiatives as part of formal and non-formal education systems. |
|
Evidence of Evaluation or Impact |
[x] Internal: [ ] External: EC Final assessment study
Monitoring and evaluation reported within the project’s final documentation and outputs. The project exceeded participation targets. |
|
Follow-up Activities / Sustainability |
Continuation through “SIREE in Action” (2021), highlighting refugee success stories and promoting inclusion in society. 4 policymakers signed a commitment letter integrating SIREE’s results into regional policies. The co-creation approach and training modules were embedded in 3 educational institutions’ curricula. |
|
Transferability Potential |
Tick box:
[x] Yes [ ] No
Reasoning: the co-creation methodology, training tools and business-support materials are publicly accessible and designed for replication across other EU regions seeking to enhance refugee integration through education and entrepreneurship. |
|
Field |
Integration of migrants & refugees; social innovation; entrepreneurship courses and English lessons for both neighbourhood members and asylum seekers; Theory of Change (ToC). |
|
Country/Region |
The Netherlands |
|
Lead organisation |
Municipality of Utrecht |
|
Project period |
2016–2019 |
|
Founding source(s) |
ERDF – Urban Innovative Actions (1st Call) |
|
Total budget |
€ 2,778,313.32 |
|
Target Group Definition |
Asylum seekers and neighbourhood members participating in entrepreneurship courses and English lessons. |
|
Size of Target Group |
|
|
Stakeholders Involved |
Describe actors involved, ideally classified via the quadruple helix model: |
|
Public sector / authorities: Municipality of Utrecht (Lead Organisation) |
|
|
Civil society / NGOs:
|
|
|
Business / employers:
|
|
|
Academia / research organisations:
|
|
|
Main Objectives of the Initiative |
To promote integration and social cohesion by regenerating a reception centre into a shared living and learning environment (“Plan Einstein”), combining education, entrepreneurship, and community engagement between asylum seekers and local citizens. |
|
Key Activities |
|
|
Level of Innovation |
Developed an inclusive model that combines reception centre regeneration, entrepreneurship training, and community-building activities within a shared living and learning environment, fostering interaction between asylum seekers and local youth. |
|
Evidence of Evaluation or Impact |
Is there a project or third-party evaluation? Tick box: [ ] Internal [x] External
*Based on the Final Evaluation Report (2019) and Assessment Study of the UIA 2014–2020. The project achieved full completion of planned activities and demonstrated high participation and engagement. |
|
Follow-up Activities / Sustainability |
Partly sustained:
|
|
Transferability Potential |
Is there evidence that this could be adapted to other contexts? Tick box: [x] Yes [ ] No
Reasoning: Publicly available manuals and evaluation reports provide guidance for municipalities and NGOs. The model has been recognised as transferable within the Urban Innovative Actions framework. |
|
Field |
Integration of migrants & refugees; entrepreneurship; employability – creation of Business Challenges Labs in high-demand areas for migrants and unemployed people (local companies and social enterprises engaged in skills development training programmes). |
|
Country/Region |
Spain |
|
Lead organisation |
Municipality of Fuenlabrada |
|
Project period |
2018–2021 |
|
Funding source(s) |
ERDF – Urban Innovative Actions (2nd Call) |
|
Total budget |
€ 3,593,342.20 |
|
Target Group Definition |
Migrants, refugees, and unemployed people participating in Business Challenges Labs and training activities. |
|
Size of Target Group |
40% of refugees involved in the project acquired employment (total number of people involved not available). |
|
Stakeholders Involved |
Describe actors involved, ideally classified via the quadruple helix model: |
|
Public sector / authorities:
|
|
|
Civil society / NGOs:
|
|
|
Business / employers: Local companies and social enterprises engaged in skills development training programmes |
|
|
Academia / research organisations: not specified |
|
|
Main Objectives of the Initiative |
To promote employability and social integration of migrants and unemployed people by developing public-private partnerships through Business Challenge Labs, connecting participants with local enterprises and social innovation initiatives. |
|
Key Activities |
|
|
Level of Innovation |
The project introduced an innovative labour integration model that links entrepreneurship, vocational training, and intercultural dialogue through collaborative BC Labs, co-managed by public authorities, NGOs, and private partners. |
|
Evidence of Evaluation or Impact |
Is there a project or third-party evaluation? Tick box: [ ] Internal [x] External
*Evaluation in the EC Assessment Study of the Urban Innovative Actions 2014-2020. The project achieved all intended outputs and demonstrated significant employment results (40% of refugee participants gained jobs). |
|
Follow-up Activities / Sustainability |
Partly sustained:
|
|
Transferability Potential |
Is there evidence that this could be adapted to other contexts? Tick box: [x] Yes [ ] No
Reasoning: Publicly available documentation and reports at https://www.uia-initiative.eu/en/uia-cities/fuenlabrada and https://portico.urban-initiative.eu/uia/final-report-bridging-gap-innovative-financing-schemes-european-cities/milma-project-migrants-labour-integration-model-based-acculturation-project |
|
MiFRIENDLY Cities operated in the field of urban social innovation for migrant and refugee integration, combining inclusive city‑development, participatory governance and employment/social‑inclusion pathways. In essence, it sought to transform the city ecosystem into a “migration‑friendly” space by mobilising migrants as active participants and by aligning employment, housing, civic engagement and legal/health access under a co‑designed model. The initiative is therefore relevant as a holistic, multi‑sectoral urban experiment in integration. |
|
|
Country/Region |
United Kingdom |
|
Lead organisation |
Coventry City Council |
|
Project period |
2018–2021 |
|
Funding source(s) |
ERDF – Urban Innovative Actions (2nd Call) |
|
Total budget |
€ 4,280,639.20 |
|
Target Group Definition |
The primary target groups were migrants and refugees residing in the West Midlands region. This included newly arrived asylum seekers, established migrants, stateless persons and those at risk of exclusion. The project explicitly emphasised vulnerable sub‑groups: women, youth, individuals experiencing language and employment barriers, and those with limited access to services. |
|
Size of Target Group |
|
|
Stakeholders Involved |
Describe actors involved, ideally classified via the quadruple helix model: |
|
Public sector / authorities:
|
|
|
Civil society / NGOs:
|
|
|
Business / employers: Social enterprises, local SMEs participating in training, employment and enterprise creation |
|
|
Academia / research organisations: Coventry University (Centre for Trust, Peace and Social Relations) – evaluation and research partner |
|
|
Main Objectives of the Initiative |
|
|
Key Activities |
|
|
Level of Innovation |
MiFRIENDLY Cities demonstrates high levels of innovation in multiple dimensions:
|
|
Evidence of Evaluation or Impact |
Is there a project or third-party evaluation? Tick box: [x] Internal [ ] External
Conducted by Coventry University; methodology includes theory of change, quantitative and qualitative data.
Positive outcomes: many of the 31 distinct actions delivered; the executive summary reports 26 of 30 areas achieved or over-achieved targets. Participants: improved confidence, new businesses started (16 ), high participant satisfaction. Challenges: Data issues flagged (demographics, long‑term tracking); legacy and sustainability still uncertain. |
|
Follow-up Activities / Sustainability |
|
|
Transferability Potential |
Is there evidence that this could be adapted to other contexts? Tick box: [x] Yes [ ] No
The guidebook was explicitly developed to support other cities in adopting the MiFriendly model. Modular and phased deployment model (partnership creation, planning & participation, implementation & legacy) makes adaptation feasible in different city contexts.
Key conditions for successful transfer: strong local authority leadership, multi‑sector partnership, migrant empowerment and long‑term commitment.
Potential pitfalls: contextual differences (legal, funding, social) may limit direct replication; robust documentation and toolkits help mitigate this. |
|
Field |
Addressing unemployment of immigrant women from Ukraine who arrived as refugees in Latvia and Estonia; economies of the Baltic states still recovering from the Covid-19 outbreak. |
|
Country/Region |
Latvia, Estonia |
|
Lead organisation |
Latvijas Biozinātņu un tehnoloģiju universitāte |
|
Project period |
Project start date: 2023-09-01 Project end date: 2024-11-30 |
|
Funding source(s) |
Interreg Funds |
|
Total budget |
€ 213 469.28 |
|
Target Group Definition |
Immigrant women from Ukraine who have arrived in Latvia and Estonia as refugees, facing economic exclusion and lack of employment due to profession-specific regulation, insecurity, low self-confidence and financial difficulties. |
|
Size of Target Group |
|
|
Stakeholders Involved |
Describe actors involved, ideally classified via the quadruple helix model: |
|
Public sector / authorities: Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies (lead partner) |
|
|
Civil society / NGOs: local associations and community organisations supporting Ukrainian refugee women’s social and professional integration, collaborating in training delivery and outreach activities. |
|
|
Business / employers: external marketing professionals, motivational speakers from the business community, small companies involved as training bases in the final phase. |
|
|
Academia / research organisations: Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, education & social development faculty and training material handbook co-developed by project partners. |
|
|
Main Objectives of the Initiative |
To design and deliver a Digital Marketing training course for immigrant women from Ukraine in Latvia and Estonia, thereby increasing their competitiveness on the labour market and enabling them to secure employment. |
|
Key Activities |
|
|
Level of Innovation |
The project introduced a cross-border cooperative model between Latvia and Estonia focused specifically on immigrant Ukrainian women (a group at high risk of economic exclusion) and up-skilled them in a high-growth profession (digital marketing). It used blended delivery (face-to-face online masterclasses), business community involvement and certification transferable into formal education credit points. |
|
Evidence of Evaluation or Impact |
Is there a project or third-party evaluation? Tick box: [x] Internal [ ] External |
|
Follow-up Activities / Sustainability |
The project materials (training handbook) developed for the two rounds may support continuation or replication. However, the source does not provide detailed data on follow-up employment outcomes beyond completion. |
|
Transferability Potential |
Is there evidence that this could be adapted to other contexts? Tick box: [x] Yes [ ] No
Reasoning: the model is documented (training handbook, cross-border workshop design) and focuses on a transferable topic (digital marketing) for a refugee/immigrant women target group in a multilingual region. The cross-border nature (Latvia & Estonia) builds an experience of replication in similar Baltic/European contexts. |
|
Field |
Empowerment of refugee women affected by military conflicts through entrepreneurship and innovation; creation of a transnational mechanism supporting women entrepreneurs and innovators from Ukraine and other countries in similar situations. |
|
Country/Region |
Poland, Estonia, Norway, Lithuania, Latvia, Sweden, Denmark, Estonia |
|
Lead organisation |
Rzeszowska Agencja Rozwoju Regionalnego Spółka Akcyjna |
|
Project period |
Project start date: 2023-01-01 Project end date: 2025-12-3 |
|
Funding source(s) |
Interreg Funds |
|
Total budget |
€ 2, 100, 976.70 |
|
Target Group Definition |
Refugee women affected by recent military conflicts, primarily from Ukraine but also from other regions facing comparable displacement and socio-economic instability. These women face compounded barriers to employment, including trauma, cultural and language differences, limited access to finance and networks, and unfamiliarity with local market systems. |
|
Size of Target Group |
8 partner countries involved; target group composed of refugee women entrepreneurs across the Baltic Sea Region (exact number of individual beneficiaries not specified). |
|
Stakeholders Involved |
Describe actors involved, ideally classified via the quadruple helix model: |
|
Public sector / authorities:
|
|
|
Civil society / NGOs:
|
|
|
Business / employers:
All contributing to training, incubation, and market-entry support. |
|
|
Academia / research organisations:
|
|
|
Main Objectives of the Initiative |
To foster the economic integration and independence of refugee women through the creation of an enabling entrepreneurial ecosystem across the Baltic Sea Region. The initiative seeks to establish a transnational fund, mechanism and network that provide training, mentoring and access to business opportunities, empowering refugee women to become active contributors to regional economic resilience. |
|
Key Activities |
|
|
Level of Innovation |
Introduces a transnational mechanism focused on refugee women’s entrepreneurship in the Baltic Sea Region (a first of its kind within the Interreg framework). Its integrated approach combines cross-border collaboration, capacity building, psychological empowerment and business incubation to create a scalable model for inclusive economic growth. |
|
Evidence of Evaluation or Impact |
Is there a project or third-party evaluation? Tick box: [x] Internal [ ] External *Initial consultations with representatives of the target group have confirmed high interest in training and increased awareness of entrepreneurial potential, validating the project’s approach and design. These early results indicate a strong basis for sustainable future impact. |
|
Follow-up Activities / Sustainability |
The project will consolidate its cross-border collaboration and extend the established network beyond its initial implementation period. Continued Interreg funding will support further scaling and replication, ensuring long-term sustainability and strengthening refugee women’s entrepreneurial ecosystems in the Baltic Sea Region. |
|
Transferability Potential |
Is there evidence that this could be adapted to other contexts? Tick box: [x] Yes [ ] No Reasoning: the project provides a replicable, scalable framework for empowering refugee women through entrepreneurship and innovation. Its cross-border model, supported by Interreg, can inform similar efforts in other regions aiming to integrate displaced women into sustainable local economies. |
|
Field |
Digital social innovation for migrant integration – development of AI- and data-driven solutions to improve the accessibility, efficiency, and coordination of integration services in European cities. |
|
Country/Region |
Germany, Belgium, Italy, Spain, Austria |
|
Lead organisation |
City of Hamburg (Germany) |
|
Project period |
2019 – 2022 |
|
Funding source(s) |
Horizon 2020 – SC6-MIGRATION-2018-2020 (Transformations-04-2019: Innovative solutions for inclusive and sustainable urban environments) |
|
Total budget |
€ 3,300,000 |
|
Target Group Definition |
MICADO focused on migrants, refugees, and asylum seekers newly arrived or recently settled in European cities, with the dual goal of supporting them directly and empowering local authorities and communities that serve them.
|
|
Size of Target Group |
A total of 6,970 individuals directly interacted with or benefited from the platform during the pilot phase.
|
|
Stakeholders Involved |
The initiative brought together a wide range of actors following the quadruple helix model: |
|
Public authorities: 15% of participating stakeholders, including municipalities, integration departments, and local policy makers. |
|
|
Civil society / NGOs: 78% of stakeholders – migrant organisations, community centres, and volunteer associations acting as co-design partners. |
|
|
Business / employers: 1% – technology SMEs and service providers contributing to platform design and data architecture. |
|
|
Academia / research organisations: 3% – universities and data science institutes developing the algorithms and evaluation frameworks |
|
|
Main Objectives of the Initiative |
MICADO aimed to leverage data science and digital technology to streamline migrant integration into European social systems such as housing, education, and healthcare.
|
|
Key Activities |
|
|
Level of Innovation |
MICADO represents a technological and organisational breakthrough in migrant integration management. It introduced an integrated, AI-powered digital ecosystem that connects migrants, public administrations, and civil society actors within one shared interface.
Key innovation aspects include:
Through these features, MICADO transformed fragmented, paper-based service ecosystems into smart, inclusive, and participatory digital environments. |
|
Evidence of Evaluation or Impact |
Internal evaluation: conducted continuously by research partners, focusing on usability, user satisfaction, and data accuracy.
External evaluation: undertaken by Horizon 2020 reviewers and external migration policy experts, confirming the project’s excellence in citizen engagement and policy relevance
Quantitative outcomes:
Qualitative outcomes:
|
|
Follow-up Activities / Sustainability |
MICADO evolved into a modular, scalable platform, adaptable to different urban and policy contexts across Europe.
This combination of technological openness and policy embeddedness has positioned MICADO as a long-term reference model for smart integration system
|
|
Transferability Potential |
MICADO has already been tested in four countries (Germany, Italy, Belgium, Spain) and demonstrates strong adaptability across governance and linguistic context.
The project’s documentation includes replication guidelines, open-source repositories, and implementation manuals available for other cities wishing to deploy the platform. Transfer success factors:
Its modular design makes MICADO particularly relevant for mid-sized cities that lack large-scale ICT systems but face significant integration challenges.
|
|
Field |
Integration of immigrants and refugees; upskilling in entrepreneurship and business planning through Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies to foster social inclusion and economic participation across the Central Baltic region. |
|
Country/Region |
Finland, Estonia |
|
Lead organisation |
Haaga-Helia ammattikorkeakoulu Oy |
|
Project period |
Project start date: 2024-08-01 Project end date: 2026-01-31 |
|
Funding source(s) |
Interreg Funds |
|
Total budget |
€ 213 299.98 |
|
Target Group Definition |
Young newcomers (15-29), immigrants and refugees living in Finland and Estonia who wish to start their own business or work as light entrepreneurs. The project focuses on those facing barriers to employment and integration due to skill mismatches, limited digital literacy and lack of entrepreneurship competences. |
|
Size of Target Group |
3 beneficiaries/partner organisations (number of individual participants not specified). |
|
Stakeholders Involved |
Describe actors involved, ideally classified via the quadruple helix model: |
|
Public sector / authorities: local and regional agencies supporting immigrant integration and employment policies in Finland and Estonia. |
|
|
Civil society / NGOs: organisations active in-migrant support, entrepreneurship mentoring and social inclusion initiatives. |
|
|
Business / employers: start-up communities, business incubators and companies providing expertise and potential placement opportunities. |
|
|
Academia / research organisations: Haaga-Helia ammattikorkeakoulu Oy (lead organisation). |
|
|
Main Objectives of the Initiative |
To reduce unemployment and social exclusion among immigrants and refugees by leveraging AI-assisted upskilling in entrepreneurship and business planning. The project promotes inclusion by empowering newcomers to develop entrepreneurial skills, explore self-employment and engage in cross-border business opportunities between Finland and Estonia. |
|
Key Activities |
|
|
Level of Innovation |
It is a pioneering initiative that integrates AI technology into immigrant upskilling for the first time within the Central Baltic framework. Through the transformation of traditional business development guides into AI-driven, interactive formats, it provides accessible, personalized entrepreneurship training. The project’s cross-border collaboration between Finland and Estonia extends its innovative scope by enabling shared expertise, cross-border entrepreneurship and sustainable business development opportunities. |
|
Evidence of Evaluation or Impact |
Is there a project or third-party evaluation? Tick box: [x] Internal [ ] External
*Impact is monitored through the creation of AI-based training tools, implementation of pilot courses and participant engagement in all phases of the project. |
|
Follow-up Activities / Sustainability |
The AI-driven upskilling model, digital tools and training materials developed in the project are designed for continued use after project completion. Public access to these resources through the project website ensures the long-term availability of the learning programme and supports the replication of the approach in other EU regions. |
|
Transferability Potential |
Is there evidence that this could be adapted to other contexts? Tick box: [x] Yes [ ] No
Reasoning: the AI-assisted upskilling model and cross-border collaboration framework can be adapted by other countries seeking innovative, technology-based solutions for immigrant integration and entrepreneurship promotion. |
|
Field |
Urban and community social innovation: empowering local authorities to develop human rights–based and inclusive approaches to migrant reception and integration through transnational cooperation and participatory governance. |
|
Country/Region |
Netherlands, Spain, Romania, Portugal, Italy, Belgium, Croatia, France, Poland |
|
Lead organisation |
Municipality of Utrecht (Netherlands) |
|
Project period |
June 2023 – December 2025 |
|
Funding source(s) |
Interreg Programme 2021–2027 – Interreg VI-C URBACT IV Network |
|
Total budget |
Not publicly disclosed (URBACT standard network budget framework) |
|
Target Group Definition |
WELDI targets newly arrived migrants, refugees, and asylum seekers, together with municipal administrations and local communities involved in their reception and integration.
|
|
Size of Target Group |
The network involves ten participating cities across nine EU countries, engaging approximately 1,200-1,500 direct stakeholders (migrants, local officials, civil society actors).
Beyond the core participants, WELDI’s outputs (such as the Human Rights-Based Approach toolkit) are accessible to hundreds of municipalities through the wider URBACT platform, amplifying its indirect reach. |
|
Stakeholders Involved |
Describe actors involved, ideally classified via the quadruple helix model: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Main Objectives of the Initiative |
WELDI aims to build inclusive and welcoming cities where migrants and local residents co-create policies and services that respect human dignity and equality.
|
|
Key Activities |
These activities aim to institutionalise inclusive governance practices that transform integration from ad hoc support into systemic, participatory local policy. |
|
Level of Innovation |
WELDI is a pioneering example of governance and social innovation in migration management. Distinctive innovation features:
By shifting focus from service provision to rights realisation and participation, WELDI redefines what “welcoming cities” mean in the European context. |
|
Evidence of Evaluation or Impact |
Is there a project or third-party evaluation? Tick box: [x] Internal [x] External
WELDI is currently under implementation (2023-2025).
Impact assessment tools focus on institutional change rather than quantitative service delivery, in line with the network’s governance innovation objectives. |
|
Follow-up Activities / Sustainability |
WELDI’s sustainability strategy is built into the URBACT framework:
This model ensures that the HRBA methodology becomes part of the institutional culture of cities, not only a project output. |
|
Transferability Potential |
Is there evidence that this could be adapted to other contexts? Tick box: [x] Yes [ ] No Reasoning: the WELDI framework has high transferability potential, as it offers:
Its adaptability to different governance systems and demographic profiles makes it relevant for both Western and Central-Eastern European contexts, particularly where municipalities are at different stages of developing inclusive integration policies. |
|
Field |
Inclusive education and social innovation – developing the first framework, resources, and training modules for integrating Social Innovation Education (SIE) into classrooms for students with Additional Educational Needs (AEN). |
|
Country/Region |
Cyprus, France, Greece, Ireland, Romania |
|
Lead organisation |
ADOSEN Prévention Santé MGEN (France) – Non-governmental organisation / social enterprise |
|
Project period |
2022 – 2024 |
|
Funding source(s) |
Erasmus Programme |
|
Total budget |
€400,000 |
|
Target Group Definition |
SIE4P.Inc directly engages students with Additional Educational Needs (AEN) (including learners with disabilities, learning difficulties, or social disadvantages) across mainstream and special schools. |
|
Size of Target Group |
Across the five partner countries, the project involved 176 students (approximately 40% girls and 60% boys) and 51 teachers participating in the pilots and training activities. |
|
Stakeholders Involved |
Describe actors involved, ideally classified via the quadruple helix model: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Main Objectives of the Initiative |
The SIE4P.Inc project seeks to empower students with Additional Educational Needs to become agents of social change, through a transformative education approach that embeds social innovation competences in inclusive classrooms. Its specific objectives include:
The project thus redefines inclusion as not only access to education, but also active participation and empowerment within learning processes.
|
|
Key Activities |
These activities fostered the integration of social innovation principles into inclusive education, while also promoting teacher collaboration at the European level. |
|
Level of Innovation |
SIE4P.Inc is the first European initiative to operationalise Social Innovation Education specifically for students with Additional Educational Needs. Distinctive innovation elements include:
By embedding social innovation competences (creativity, collaboration, empathy, civic responsibility) within special education, SIE4P.Inc expands the boundaries of both fields and offers a transformative model for inclusive schooling. |
|
Evidence of Evaluation or Impact |
Is there a project or third-party evaluation? Tick box: [x] Internal [ ] External
Although the project is still ongoing (2022–2024), early evidence from pilot evaluations demonstrates:
Evaluation data is being collected through teacher feedback forms, observation protocols, and participant self-assessments, ensuring continuous improvement of the model. |
|
Follow-up Activities / Sustainability |
SIE4P.Inc has developed an open, scalable framework designed for transfer to schools beyond the initial partnership.
Given its alignment with EU inclusion and innovation agendas, the framework is expected to inform future Erasmus and ESF initiatives on inclusive education. |
|
Transferability Potential |
Is there evidence that this could be adapted to other contexts? Tick box: [x] Yes [ ] No Reasoning: the SIE4P.Inc model has high transferability potential, as its framework and digital toolkit are publicly available and adaptable to diverse educational contexts.
Its adaptability across different cultural and policy contexts makes SIE4P.Inc a valuable model for the inclusive education dimension of the SIMPLE project. |
The practices presented in this Compendium demonstrate how social innovation can effectively bridge education, employability, and social inclusion for migrants and refugees, transforming fragmented interventions into systemic solutions. Their innovative nature does not lie in isolated tools or pilot actions, but in the way they reconfigure existing resources, actors, and delivery models to generate structural change. Each of the thirteen selected initiatives introduces a distinctive innovation dimension, whether through new forms of collaboration across the quadruple helix, participatory co-design with beneficiaries, or the integration of digital and community-based learning methods. Taken together, they embody the core principles of the SIMPLE approach: inclusiveness, transferability, and sustainability.
A first group of practices introduces pedagogical and methodological innovation in the field of education and vocational training for migrants. Initiatives such as FIER and FORWORK operationalise integrated pathways combining formal training, mentoring, and on-the-job learning, linking public employment services, training providers, and private employers. Their strength lies in the systematic use of competence mapping and individual learning plans, which enable faster and more tailored transitions to employment. Similarly, projects such as U-RLP, CORE, and Curing the Limbo innovate by embedding language acquisition, civic participation, and community-building within employability programmes, demonstrating that social and educational integration can be mutually reinforcing when delivered through participatory and place-based models.
A second group demonstrates organisational and governance innovation by redefining the way public, private, and civil society actors collaborate. Initiatives like MiFriendly Cities and Hobelab transform local ecosystems into laboratories of inclusion, where municipalities, NGOs, and businesses co-create services with refugees themselves. Their innovation lies in governance mechanisms that shift from top-down assistance to shared ownership, encouraging migrants to act as mentors, trainers, or social entrepreneurs. Such participatory governance ensures both legitimacy and sustainability and directly anticipates the SIMPLE project’s emphasis on the quadruple-helix model as a driver of system-level impact.
A third cluster introduces technological and digital innovation, extending opportunities for inclusion through accessible, scalable solutions. Projects such as BSI_4WOMEN, Women Online, and UPBEAT empower refugee and migrant women through digital and entrepreneurial literacy, bridging gender and skills gaps while leveraging technology as a catalyst for social and economic empowerment. These initiatives illustrate how digital transformation can serve not only efficiency but also equity, expanding access to learning, mentoring, and employment for groups facing multiple forms of vulnerability.
Across these diverse experiences, innovation emerges as a multidimensional process encompassing service design, capacity-building, and policy learning. All selected practices adopt a user-centred approach, co-creating interventions with beneficiaries and adapting them to specific territorial or socio-economic contexts. They also share a commitment to evidence-based evaluation and continuous learning, as most have undergone external assessments demonstrating measurable effects on skills acquisition, employability, and social participation.
By integrating pedagogical, organisational, and technological innovation, these initiatives offer concrete models of how education and employability can be jointly addressed through social innovation.
Collectively, the practices validate the SIMPLE consortium’s vision that migrant integration and labour inclusion require holistic, flexible, and collaborative approaches. They showcase the capacity of social innovation to generate systemic solutions, ones that not only enhance the employability of migrants but also strengthen the resilience, openness, and inclusiveness of European societies. These experiences thus provide both the empirical foundation and the inspirational reference for the SIMPLE model and its Theory of Change, guiding the project’s next phases of piloting, stakeholder engagement, and scaling.
We would like to acknowledge the contributions to this “Selected Innovations Compendium” made by all of the SIMPLE - Social Innovation Models to Promote Learning and Employability consortium partners:
Hétfa Kutatóintézet KFT (HEFTA), Hungary
CTS Customized Training Solutions sp. z o.o. (CTS), Poland
University Civitas (University Civitas), Poland
Adriatic Ionian Euroregion (AIE), Croatia
Institut de Haute Formation aux Politiques Communautaires asbl (IHF), Belgium
IDP SAS DI GIANCARLO COSTANTINO (ITALIAN DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS) (IDP), Italy
Asociación IT Solutions for All (ITSFA),Spain
Hope Ukraine Foundation E.T.S. (HOPE UKRAINE), Italy
DISCLAIMER
Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or European Social Fund Agency. Neither the European Union nor the Granting Authority can be held responsible for them.
LICENCE
“Selected Innovations Compendium” © 2025 by Hétfa Kutatóintézet KFT (HEFTA), CTS Customized Training Solutions sp. z o.o. (CTS), Poland, University Civitas (University Civitas), Poland, Adriatic Ionian Euroregion (AIE), Croatia, Institut de Haute Formation aux Politiques Communautaires asbl (IHF), Belgium, IDP SAS DI GIANCARLO COSTANTINO (ITALIAN DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS) (IDP), Italy,
Asociación IT Solutions for All (ITSFA),Spain, Hope Ukraine Foundation E.T.S. (HOPE UKRAINE), Italy – is licensed under:
Legal description – Creative Commons licensing: The SIMPLE - Social Innovation Models to Promote Learning and Employability project materials are classified as Open Educational Resources' (OER) and can be freely (without permission of their creators): downloaded, used, reused, copied, adapted, and shared by users, with information about the source of their origin

To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or European Social Fund Agency. Neither the European Union nor the Granting Authority can be held responsible for them.
Collaboration is at the heart of the SIMPLE project. We work with a diverse range of stakeholders from academia, industry, government, and civil society to achieve our goals. Our partnerships are crucial for establishing strong networks, sharing resources, and maximizing the impact of our initiatives for Ukrainian refugees.
Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or European Social Fund Agency. Neither the European Union nor the Granting Authority can be held responsible for them.
Legal description – Creative Commons licensing: The materials published on the SIMPLE project website are classified as Open Educational Resources' (OER) and can be freely (without permission of their creators): downloaded, used, reused, copied, adapted, and shared by users, with information about the source of their origin.